Self-reliance or isolation?

July 17th, 2006

Joong Ang Daily
7/17/2006

At the end of “the hermit kingdom,” or Joseon Dynasty, the outer world tried hard to force Korea to open its doors.

Japan forced the Joseon leaders to sign the Treaty of Ganghwa, or Korea-Japanese Treaty of Amity, and then used force to enter Korea.

The United States also eagerly wanted to secure a market here. When the U.S. ship the General Sherman was attacked by infuriated Koreans, the United States used the incident as an excuse to force Korean to open its doors and also sign a trade treaty.

Russia intensified its fleet at Vladivostok in preparation for a southward expansion.

The Qing Dynasty couldn’t stand the idea of its tributary state being under the influence of other countries and thus gave Li Hongzhang, a Chinese politician and general, exclusive power to interfere in domestic affairs inside Korea.

What is the right way to keep self-reliance in the face of outer forces’ attempts to open a nation’s doors?

To this question by Emperor Gojong, a booklet titled “Joseon Chaengnyak,” or “Korean Strategy,” gave an answer.

The book was written by He Ruzhang, a Chinese minister of the Qing legation stationed in Japan.

The author advised that Korea should consult on all matters with China, engage with Japan and sign a trade treaty with the United States in order to keep Russia in check. (From “World Diplomatic History,” by Kim Yong-Koo.)

But Japan was brutal, the United States was too far away to help and Russia was insidious.

Self-reliance means balancing power between nations and that first requires the possession of a certain amount of power. Lacking that, there was little that Emperor Gojong could do.

One hundred and twenty years have since passed. But the foreign policy of Emperor Gojong and that of President Roh Moo-hyun look similar, except that Korea has gained a little bit more capability since those deplorable days.

Both leaders have emphasized self-reliance and a minimum of intervention by other countries. Both have tried to become mediators and secure a leading position through the balance of power.

Does President Roh then have more options in the midst of the current missile crisis?

There is little proof that international order has become more advantageous to us than during the times of Emperor Gojong in the late 19th century.

Except Japan, the other three powers ― the United States, Russia and China ― have become permanent members of the United Nations Security Council.

The format of the four countries has become two sided — the United States and Japan versus China and Russia.

On top of this, North Korea has been added as a rogue country that is a beneficiary of China and Russia’s strategic protection.

In this post-modern era, the legacy from the previous era remains clearly in the Asian region. People in Korea have vivid memories of the colonial era and strong nationalism recalls the nightmares of past imperialism.

Under these complicated circumstances, North Korea fired its missiles as if publicly displaying its political beliefs.

Borrowing the North Korean leader Kim Jong-il’s rhetoric, that was a “revolutionary force that will crush imperialism.”

The head of North Korea, Kim Jong-il, wants to get through this situation, although it may require him to resort to extreme methods.

After shocking international society, he has remained low-profile, as if asking, “What will you do now?”

South Korea is in the trickiest position. Seoul had told the world powers that it would resolve the North Korea problem in its own way and asked them to wait, while approaching Pyongyang.

Seoul must now feel that it was betrayed after giving aid to the North.

To the South Korean unification minister who revealed this feeling, the head of the North’s delegation delivered his leader’s message that South Koreans also benefit from the North’s military-first policy.

Whether the head of the South Korean delegation became speechless at that remark or not, if a serious statement condemning the insane aspects of that claim is not released, the United States and Japan will assume that South Korea is not much different from the North.

If the North’s intention was to separate South Korea from an alliance with the United States and Japan, or to make publicly obvious the South Korean government’s sympathy for the North, it has achieved some of those goals by launching its missiles.

When President Roh, who has remained quiet on the missile incident, condemned Japan for talking about the possibility of a pre-emptive attack on the North, Kim Jong-il must have worn a smug face.

Kim Hong-jip, who claimed that Korea should engage the Japanese, was beaten to death by a public crowd in downtown Seoul. Emperor Gojong had to endure the collapse of the Joseon Dinasty.

Although 120 years have passed since the “Joseon Chaengnyak” was written, Koreans are still confused which country they should stay close to, which country to engage with and which country to reach out to.

The government set its strategy for peaceful co-existence to achieve self-reliance and to become a mediator.

It also kept providing aid to the North, arguing that it should help North Korea to stay afloat in order to avoid a war. These arguments were crushed by the North’s missile launchings.

Seoul seems unable to turn its head when Pyongyang asks for supply of electronic power and rice.

As the United States and Japan are likely to push North Korea further away, labeling it a rogue country, South Korea’s cooperation with the two countries does not seem probable either.

If there is no chance to work with other countries, South Korea will be adrift in the middle of a turbulent sea for a good while, with its flag of self-reliance flapping.

Japan is sly, the United States has adopted a hardline and China and Russian call themselves the big brothers of North Korea.

I wonder what is the “new Korea strategy” that can rescue the vessel named “Roh Moo-hyun”.

by Song Ho-keun 
Professor of Sociology at Seoul National University
Translation by the JoongAng Daily staff

Share

Korea Telecom in deal DPRK firm

July 17th, 2006

Korea Times
7/17/2006

KT, South Korea’s leading fixed-line telecom carrier, signed a 360 million won ($380,000) outsourcing contract last week with a North Korean agency to develop six smart software programs.

A Ministry of Unification official yesterday said the deal between KT and Samcholli General Corp. was struck last Thursday as planned (see the front page of The Korea Times, July 13 edition).

“Samcholli agreed to develop six computer programs in such fields as next-generation networks and voice recognition by the end of this year for 360 million won,’’ said the ministry official, who declined to be named.

“Under the contract, KT can refuse to pay the promised money, if Samcholli fails to meet pre-set requirements by the operator,’’ he added.

However, the two sides could not reach an agreement on the pilot run of value-added processing this year with a pair of telecom items _ polyvinyl chloride (PVC) and splitters _ for some reason.

They initially planned to ink a deal on the test run of the value-added processing, under which KT will provide raw materials while Samcholli will crank out final products in return for commission.

Share

ROK aid to DPRK tops $1 billion since 1995

July 16th, 2006

From the Korea Times:

South Korea’s economic assistance to North Korea in the first half of this year topped 141 billion won ($148 million), while the total government aid to the impoverished state since 1995 exceeded 1 trillion won ($1 billion).

According to government statistics on Sunday, the Unification Ministry gave assistance worth 141 billion won to the North in the first half of the year, the highest ever on a yearly basis. Last year’s assistance reached around 123 billion won, including rice aid.

Share

US evangelist to speak in DPRK

July 16th, 2006

Update: from the Daily Comet (Its in Louisiana)

An Orange County pastor who wrote the best-selling book “The Purpose Driven Life” has delayed a planned visit to North Korea amid heightened tension with the U.S. over the country’s recent missile launches.

Rick Warren, pastor of Saddleback Valley Community Church, had planned to meet with North Korean officials Monday to arrange a future preaching trip, Warren’s spokesman A. Larry Ross said.

The trip has now been delayed, but may be rescheduled within the week, a statement from the church said.

The statement did not say whether the delay was due to the increased tensions between the U.S. and North Korea, which have flared since North Korea test fired seven missiles on July 4.

Warren was in Seoul, South Korea Sunday for meetings with church and government leaders and U.S. troops.

The proposed March 2007 preaching trip to North Korea would be to commemorate the 100th anniversary of a Christian revival in Pyongyang, now the country’s capital, and was to include a rally at a 15,000-seat stadium.

A 2002 U.S. State Department report estimated the country of 23 million has some 10,000 Protestants and 4,000 Catholics.

The U.S. does not maintain diplomatic relations with North Korea, though it has participated in negotiations over ending the country’s nuclear program.

Original Post: 7/8/2006

This is too bizarre to be fiction.  From World Net Daily (Which I do not read, BTW):

‘Purpose-Driven’ pastor to preach in N. Korea
Warren planning 1st evangelical stadium crusade in 60 years inside communist

Rick Warren may be put to a tough test next year when the Southern California preacher holds the first evangelical stadium crusade in 60 years in North Korea.

Warren, who is on a 40-day, 13-nation tour, will visit Kaesong on July 17 to plan for the March 2007 crusade after being invited by a group of North Korean businessmen who visited him at his Saddleback Church’s Lake Forest office last month.

“I will be the first preacher in 60 years to speak publicly in North Korea,” Warren told the Orange County Register. “I’m honored.”

He said the North Korean government would allow him to preach in a stadium seating 15,000 but a larger venue would be provided if he could fill the seats.

Because there are no diplomatic relations between the two countries, the businessmen, who say they met with Warren and extended the invitation to preach with approval of the North Korean government, are facilitating his visit next week.

“We are ready to go on our end. We’re just waiting for information back on approval and access,” Anne Krumm, a spokeswoman for the church, said.

North Korea’s missile tests have cast uncertainty on whether Warren, who is presently in Indonesia, can enter North Korea as planned.

“They’re trying to figure out how they can get in and how to do that,” she said.

Warren compares his opportunity to preach in the communist state to Rev. Billy Graham’s visit to the then-Soviet Union, saying he hopes to be able to promote religious freedom where it has been severely restricted since 1945.

“When you go in they have to loosen up on religious freedoms,” Warren said. “They have to just by your presence. It’s like Mandela going into a country. Automatically people start loosening up.”

Suzanne Scholte, chairman of the North Korea Freedom Coalition isn’t so sure.

“To go in there and believe that you could actually preach freely is an illusion. It won’t do anything to help the church. It will only put the true church at risk, and it will be used as a propaganda piece by the Kim Jong Il regime.”

Warren said he is aware that some might misinterpret his visit as an endorsement of the North Korean regime.

“When Billy Graham went to the Soviet Union, there was a lot of criticism of: ‘Well, they’re using you.’ And he said: ‘Well, yeah, they’re using me, but I’m using them too.’,” Warren said.

Graham was criticized following his 1982 visit to Moscow for letting himself be used by the communists when he said he had seen no evidence of religious persecution by the Soviet government and observed that religious freedom was somewhat greater among the people than he had anticipated.

When preaching at the Yelohovski Russian Orthodox Cathedral, Graham exhorted his audience to be better members of the communist state: “God can make you love people you normally would not love. He gives you the power to be a better worker, a more loyal citizen because in Romans 13 we are told to obey the authorities.”

Since 2001, North Korea has been designated a “country of particular concern” for violations of religious freedom. Its citizens may not belong to unauthorized religious groups, and believers who proselytize or have ties to evangelical groups in China are arrested, tortured or executed, a 2005 State Department report said.

Given North Korea’s history of persecution, Scholte’s fear is that the government will use the crusade to identify Christian believers who will be “rounded up and sent to a political prison camp” once Warren leaves the country.

Addendum from the Korea Times:

According to Warren’s own account posted on his Web site, a delegation of South Korean businessmen visited him at Saddleback Church in late June and invited him to speak at the public outdoor Christian service to be held in the North Korean capital in March next year marking the 100th anniversary of the Pyongyang Revival in 1907. The South Koreans had obtained permission for the service, which will be the first of its kind in 60 years as the dictatorial North Korean regime virtually bans any religious activities in public.

“My hope is that these visits will promote religious freedom in a country where the practice of individual faith has been tightly controlled and virtually prohibited since 1945,” he wrote.

Share

DPRK at the World Choir Games

July 15th, 2006

Youtube has the video.

This is the most “traditional” sounding I have ever heard North Korean music.  Not one single accordian! shocking…

The 4th World Choir Games were held in Xiamen China from the 15th to the 26th of July, 2006.

I don’t know who won. 

Share

DPRK IP Law on Software

July 14th, 2006

KoryoPAT-Rainbow Patent and Trademark Agency:

Chapter 1. Fundamentals 
Article 1.  The Law of the DPRK on the Protection of Computer Software shall contribute to the protection of the right of copyright holders and the development of software technology by establishing strict system and order in the registration and use of software.
Article 2. Registration of software is the prime process in the protection of software. The state sees to it that the objects to be protected be decided properly and scientific accuracy, objectivity, timeliness be ensured in its registration.

Article 3.  The state sees to it that the development of software is encouraged and the moral and economic rights of software copyright holders are protected.

Article 4.  The copyright of a software that has been developed by a foreign legal person or an individual and registered first in the DPRK shall be protected by this law.

Article 5.  The state shall direct a deep attention to the work of software protection and increase its investment in the sector of software protection.

Article 6.  The treaties concluded by the DPRK for software protection shall have the same effect as this law.

Article 7.  The state shall develop exchange and cooperation with international organizations and other countries in the field of software protection.
Chapter 2. Registration of Computer Software 
Article 8.  It is an important requirement for software protection to have softwares registered in a proper way. Softwares shall be registered by the software registration organ.

Article 9.  The institutions, enterprises, organizations or citizens that want to have their software protected shall submit to the software registration organ a written application for registration. The written application for registration shall elucidate the name of the software, the name, nationality and address of the applicant, the date of application and be attached to by the medium containing the software, its outline and specification, etc.

Article 10.  The software registration organ shall deliberate and approve or reject the registration of the software within three months from the date of its acceptance of the application. In this case the software shall be debugged.

Article 11.  The deliberation of software registration shall be done in the way of ascertaining the software developer and confirming whether there is anything identical or similar to the software already registered. The deliberation of an adapted software for registration shall be done by means of inquring whether the right of the original author has not been infringed upon.

Article 12.  The software registration organ may require the data needed for deliberation from the relevant institution, enterprise, organization or citizen. The institutions, enterprises, organizations and citizens should offer in time the data required by the software registration organ.

Article 13.  The software registration organ shall issue a copyright certificate in case it approves the registration. In case softwarte registration is rejected, a notice clarifying the reason of rejection shall be sent to the applicant.

Article 14.  A registered software shall be made public through the official bulletin. A registered software may not be made public subject to the request of the state or the copyright holder.

Article 15.  The institution, enterprise, organization or citizen that has any opinion against software registration may lodge it with the software registration organ within six months from the date when the registration is made public. The software registration organ shall settle the opinion within two months from the date when the opinion is received.

Article 16.  The software registration organ shall store in a designated storage the medium containing the software as well as the written application for registration of software. The storage should be equipped with the facilities needed for preventing damages and destruction of software.

Article 17.  The institutions, enterprises, organizations and citizens should register the software they have brought in from abroad in the software registration organ. A software from a foreign country may not be used if it is not registered.

Article 18.  The institutions, enterprises, organizations and citizens may inspect the software registry at the software registration organ. In this case they shall pay designated charges.

Chapter 3. Copyright of Computer Software 
Article 19.  The institution, enterprise, organization or citizen that has developed a software shall be entitled to be a software copyright holder. The institution, enterprise, organization or citizen that has been transferred a software copyright may also be a copyright holder.

Article 20.  The moral rights of a software copyright holder shall include;  The right to make public a software, The right to attach the name of the developer to the software,
The right to forbid any alteration of the name of the developer or the name, content, etc. of the software.
 
Article 21.  The moral rights of a software copyright holder shall be possessed by the software developer. The moral rights of a copyright holder may not be transferred.

Article 22. The economic rights of a software copyright holder shall include;  The right to copy, exhibit and circulate the software, The right to adapt the software, The right to permit the use of the software and to receive relevant charges, The right to transfer a part or the whole of the software economic rights, The right to claim indemnity for the damage caused by infringement upon the software copyright.
 
Article 23.  The transferred economic right of a software under a contract should be registered in the software registration organ. The registration should be done within seven days from the date of transferrence.

Article 24.  The copyright of a software developed in the name of an institution, enterprise or organization shall be granted to the institution, enterprise or organization concerned. The copyright of a software devoloped in the name of an individual shall be granted to the individual concerned. The copyright of a software developed by a group of people shall be owned jointly. In this case the exercise of the right shall be subject to the agreement of the developers.

Article 25.  The copyright of a software developed on consignment shall be owned according to the contract concluded among the parties. The written contract shall accurately clarify the ownership and exercise of the copyright.

Article 26.  A software copyright may be owned by a minor as well. The copyright of a minor shall be exercised through the parents or guardian.

Article 27.  If a software copyright holder has no heir or is dead without leaving a will to present his copyright to anyone else or if there is no institution, enterprise or organization to inherit the copyright, the economic rights of the software concerned shall be owned by the state.

Chapter 4. Protection of Computer Software Copyright 
Article 28.  It is incumbent upon institutions, enterprises, organizations and citizens to protect software copyrights. Institutions, enterprises, organizations and citizens should not infringe upon software copyrights.

Article 29. The term of protecting the moral rights of software copyright holder shall be indefinite and the term of protecting the economic rights shall be 30 years. In case of need, the term of protecting the economic rights may be prolonged for up to 20 years.

Article 30.  The term of protecting the economic rights of a software copyright holder shall be until December 31 of the 30th year from the day when the software is registered. The term of protecting the economic rights of a transferred software copyright shall be the remaining period from the day when the transfer is registered.

Article 31.  Institutions, enterprises, organizations and citizens may use a registered software subject to the permission of the copyright holder. The use of a software shall be within the range of permission.

Article 32.  The institutions, enterprises, organizations and citizens that use a software should pay the designated charges. Charges shall be designated by the price assessment organ.

Article 33.  Institutions, enterprises, organizations and citizens may use the patented literary and artistic works for developing or adapting a software. In this case they should get the permission of the copyright holder.

Article 34.  Without the permission of the copyright holder, one may not do the following;  The acts of using, copying, exhibiting, distributing, adapting, translating, selling or telecasting a software, The acts of altering the name of a software developer or a software, The acts of exporting or importing a software, The acts of destroying or removing protection devices of software technology and offering such technology.
 
Article 35.  One may copy and use a software without the permission of the copyright holder in the following cases;  When a software is used for educational purpose in educational institutions, When a software is used for investigation of a case by a law enforcement organ, When the software has been distributed free of charge.
 
Chapter 5. Guidance and Control of Computer Software Protection 
Article 36.  It is the basic guarantee for the correct implementation of the State policy of software protection to strengthen the guidance and control of the work for software protection. The State shall intensify the guidance and control of the work for software protection.

Article 37.  Guidance of software protection shall be undertaken by the central software industrial guidance organ. The central software industrial guidance organ shall establish a proper system for software protection and regularly grasp and guide the work of registering, storing and protecting software.

Article 38.  The central software industrial guidance organ may set up its agencies in the fields necessary for registering and protecting software. The agency should consist of qualified personnel.

Article 39.  Supervision and control over software protection shall be undertaken by the central software industrial guidance organ and the supervisory and control organs concerned. The central software industrial guidance organ and the supervisory and control organs concerned should strictly supervise and control such acts as infringement upon copyrights, production, copy and circulation of computer virus as well as a software containing the content counter to the good national manners and customs, destruction or illegal inspection of a software through computer networks.

Article 40.  In case of any infringement upon software copyright, the damage shall be compensated and the money illegally gained and the software used confiscated.

Article 41.  An official of an institution, enterprise or organization, or an individual citizen who is responsible for serious consequences related with software protection by his/her violation of this law shall be liable to administrative or criminal penalty according to gravity.

Article 42.  A dispute arising in relation to software protection shall be settled by negotiation. In case it is not settled by negotiation, the dispute may be brought to arbitration or to a court for settlement.

Share

DPRK and intellectual property primer

July 14th, 2006

The DPRK is a signatory to these  IP accords

  • WIPO, since August 17, 1974
  • Paris Convention (IP Protection), since June 10, 1980
  • Patent Cooperation Treaty, since July 8, 1980
  • Madrid Agreement (International Registration of Marks), since Jan. 15, 1980
  • Madrid Protocol (International Registration of Marks), since Oct. 3, 1996
  • Hague Agreement (International Deposit of Industrial Designs), since May 27, 1992
  • Nice Agreement (International Classification of Goods & Services), since June 6, 1997
  • Strasbourg Agreement Concerning the International Patent Classification, since November 21, 2002 (source)
  • Locarno Agreement (Int’l Classification for Industrial Designs), since June 6, 1997
  • Budapest Treaty on the International Recognition of the Deposit of Microorganisms for the Purposes of Patent Procedure, since February 21, 2002 (source)

Here are the related agencies for registering a patent, trademerk (industrial design), and copyright:

For Patent and Inventions:
Invention Office of DPR Korea
Address: Kinmaul 1Dong, Bipa Street, Moranbong Dist.,
Pyongyang, DPR Korea
Tel: (850-2) 381 18111. Ext:8544
Fax: (850-2) 381 4410
E-mail:[email protected]
Head of office: Kim Il Hyok, Director General, DPRK Invention Office

For Trademark and Industrial Design:
State Administration for Quality Management
Address: Songyo 2 Dong, Songyo Dist., Pyongyang, DPR Korea
Tel: (850-2) 381 18111. ext:8989
Fax: (850-2) 381 4480
E-mail: [email protected]
Head of office: Kim Hyon Chol, President, DPRK State Administration for Quality Management

For Copyright
DPRK Copyright Office
Address: Donghung-Dong, Central Dist., Pyongyang, DPR Korea
Tel: (850-2) 18111.ext:8883
Head of Office: Jang Chol Sun , Director Fax: (850-2) 381 4410
E-mail:[email protected]

There are two law firms based in the DPRK that liase with these agencies on behalf of foreign interests.  These agencies are:

KoryoPAT- Rainbow Patent & Trademark Agency
P.O. Box: 19, Ryonhwa-dong 1, Central District,
Pyongyang, DPR Korea
Tel : +850-2-18777/888, ext: 8048
Fax : +850-2-3814644
E-mail : [email protected]

The KoryoPAT-Rainbow (Patent and Trademark Agency) was founded on August 15, 1986 and restructured on Oct. 15, 2003 to meet the requirements of the 21st century in its IP international transactions.

KoryoPAT-Rainbow is full service business law firm.  With affiliation in Government advisory bodies, industrial and commercial sectors, lawyers, organizations and international associations, the KoryoPAT-Rainbow provides the clients with a most efficient and affordable legal services.

The KoryoPAT-Rainbow holds it as its lifeline to serve their clients efficiently, qualitatively, speedily and creditably.

In the KoryoPAT-Rainbow there are over 50 staffers with 20 attorneys and agents who, as university or college graduates, are well versed in chemistry and biology, metallurgy, mechanics, electric & electronic engineering, computer software & hardware, and other fields of science and technology. They have been specially trained in IP transactions in an efficient way. 

RyongSong Patent and Trade Office
Mr. Yong-Sik Ro, Patent Attorney
P.O.Box: 75, Sangsin-dong, Sosong District,
Pyongyang, D.P.R.K.

Ms. Jong-Suk Jin, Trademark Attorney
RyongSong Patent Office (Main Office),
P.O.Box: 75, Sangsin-dong, Sosong District,
Pyongyang, D.P.R.K.

In Europe:
Ms. Un-Ae Che, European Representative
RyongSong Patent Office (Branch),
Schweglerstr. 21/3, A-1150, Vienna, AUSTRIA
Tel.:     +43-1-982-2082
Fax:     +43-1-982-2084
e-mail:  [email protected]

The RyonSong Patent Office of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea provides services to foreign and local companies and individuals for protecting intellectual properties including patents, trademarks, industrial design and copyright, in the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea. 

The RyongSong Patent Office was established in July of 1998, and has since then been working in close partnership with numerous agencies and patent attorneys in over 60 countries throughout the World.  Fully appreciated for its high sense of responsibility, the RyongSong Patent Office provides prompt services in drawing up and filing of applications, counseling, litigation, licensing, technology transfers, and many more.

The RyongSong Patent Office is conveniently situated very close to the Invention Office of the D.P.R.K., and is staffed with highly specialized patent and trademark attorneys with university degrees in engineering, electronics, biology, chemistry, physics, biochemistry, medicine, software engineering, and others.  All attorneys have had at least 10 years of experience in the fields of science and technology research.  Furthermore, all attorneys are fluent in conversational and written English as well as Chinese.  Applications in English, German, French, Spanish, Russian, Chinese or Japanese will be translated into Korean.

Here are their procedures for registering patents, trademarks, and industrial designs.

Share

American TV show broadcasts from Kaesong

July 13th, 2006

From Google Video:

This is America’s host Dennis Wholey does a great job filming from the Kaesong Industrial complex.

Check it out.

Share

ROK halts DPRK humanitarian aid

July 13th, 2006

The 2005 winners of the Nobel Prize in Economics were selected for “having enhanced our understanding of conflict and cooperation through game-theory analysis”.  I would check out thier work in order to make sense of the current DPRK/ROK diplomatic posturing.

From the Washington Post:

South Korea on Thursday suspended humanitarian aid to North Korea until it agrees to return to international nuclear disarmament talks.

The action infuriated visiting North Korean officials, who immediately cut off high-level talks in South Korea and stormed back home.

The decision to postpone consideration of a North Korean request for 500,000 tons of rice marked the South’s first punitive action against its impoverished communist neighbor since it defied the international community and test fired seven missiles, including a long-range Taepodong-2, on July 4.

The move came as the administration of South Korean President Roh Moo Hyun has come under sharp public criticism at home for what many there viewed as a weak response by Seoul to the North’s missile tests.

South Korea on Thursday reiterated its deep opposition to a push by Japan and the United States to impose broader sanctions on North Korea through a draft resolution at the United Nation’s Security Council. Seoul has also vowed to maintain its “sunshine policy” of engagement, which has fostered the warmest ties between the Stalinist North and capitalist South since the Korean War divided them in two more than half a century ago.

But the decision to follow through with a previous threat to suspend food aid if North Korea tested missiles — a threat many experts doubted the South Koreans would stick to — displayed a new willingness by the South to use its significant economic clout to apply pressure on the North.

The North Koreans — for whom economic assistance by South Korea is topped only by China — appeared jolted by the decision. At talks being held in the South Korean city of Pusan that were originally scheduled to end Friday, Pyongyang’s delegation abruptly departed Thursday afternoon.

South Korea’s Yonhap news service reported that the North Korean officials left after circulating a statement calling the rupture the result of “reckless” attempts by South Korea to raise “irrelevant issues.” Those issues, South Korean officials said, were the recent missile tests and the North’s refusal to return to six-party talks on its nuclear programs.

The North bitterly condemned Seoul’s decision to suspend food aid, saying “the South side will pay a price before the nation for causing the collapse of the ministerial talks and bringing a collapse of North-South relations.”

South Korean officials, who in recent years have rolled out the red carpet for their visiting North Korean kin, this time offered them a simple meal and welcome bereft of customary sightseeing excursions and photo opportunities. When the North’s representatives understood they would not be returning with promises for more food aid, they simply left.

“The North Korean side expressed their position that additional negotiations would be unnecessary under the circumstance that additional humanitarian aid they need would be impossible,” Lee Kwan Se, a South Korean Unification Ministry official, told reporters.

For the United States and Japan, both pushing for a strong draft resolution at the United Nations that would ban international trade of North Korean missile and other military technology, the South Korean action was a rare diplomatic bright spot.

Christopher Hill, Washington’s top envoy on North Korea, left Beijing for Washington on Thursday after it became clear that Chinese efforts to persuade the Pyongyang government to come back to the six-party talks had apparently failed.

Before leaving, Hill said there was no indication that the North Koreans had changed their position to boycott the talks, which have been stalled since last November.

Japan, which has been deeply rattled by the North’s missile tests, vowed to continue pushing for a tough resolution that would impose sanctions on the North Koreas. But China and Russia back their alterative U.N. resolution unveiled on Wednesday. That draft would censure North Korea for its missile tests, but would endorse only voluntary measures aimed at restraining Pyongyang’s ballistic missile and nuclear weapons programs.

“The Chinese are as baffled as we are,” Hill told reporters in Beijing before departing. “China has done so much for that country and that country seems intent on taking all of China’s generosity and then giving nothing back.”

By Anthony Faiola
Washington Post Foreign Service

Share

DPRK cancels, but Kumgang hotel opens

July 12th, 2006

From the Joong Ang Daily:

An abrupt notification by the North that it would not attend caused the postponement of a celebration by the two Koreas of the launch of the Oegeumgang Hotel at Mount Kumgang in North Korea, which had been set to take place yesterday.

The 11-story, 179-room Oegeumgang Hotel still launched operations yesterday, as did Baekseju village, designed to promote rice liquor and a rest stop called Hwajinpo near Mount Kumgang.

The hotel will be open to foreign tourists who come on a Hyundai Asan package deal to visit the mountain.

Hyundai Asan Corp., the arm of Hyundai Group that spearheads inter-Korean business, said yesterday the North told them on Monday afternoon that it would not attend.

North Korea did not say why, but Hyundai said it may have been due to the international tension caused by its missile launches last week.

A Hyundai Asan spokesman said, “the absence is not likely to affect future business with North Korea.”

He added that the opening celebration date will be reset soon after discussions with the North.

Hyundai Asan also plans an event on Mount Kumgang with the North Aug. 4-6 to commemorate the late Hyundai Group founder Chung Ju-yung, who was born in North Korea. The North has not said if it will participate.

Share